sub-modules
Capital Planning
Fund what the evidence supports — defend it without the binder.
Capital meetings run on binders nobody reads and stories nobody can check. Capital Planning replaces both with cases that defend themselves: condition readings, utilization curves, and demand forecasts assembled per request, fund restrictions enforced before commitment, and the full chain from appropriation to outcome queryable when anyone asks.
Capital cycle
Each stage below moves money with its justification attached — requested with evidence, spent under rules, and auditable end to end.
data Viz
data View
section: stages
Request
Appropriation requests assemble condition, utilization, and demand evidence with fund sourcing proposed. Reviewers see the case, not just the amount.
Commit
Approved funds commit with restrictions enforced before spend. Ineligible expenditures refuse with the rule cited instead of-flagging later.
Account
Expenditures track against commitments with outcomes linked. Sponsor reports and audits assemble from the sealed chain instead of manual collection.
Capital guarantees
- Evidence-bound requests
- Condition, utilization, and demand facts attached to every ask
- Fund enforcement
- Restrictions validated before commitment with the rule cited on refusal
- Full traceability
- Appropriation to commitment to expenditure to outcome, queryable end to end
- section
- capabilities
Capital by industry
Capital discipline bends per industry — same traceability, different funding stakes.
data Viz
data View
section: industries
Government
Appropriations by fund with allotments, commitments, and expenditures tracked per program. Budget modifications show impact on open commitments immediately.
Education
Endowment draws with spending rules, grant matching, and capital project tracking from budget through completion with sponsor reporting attached.
Healthcare
Equipment and facility capital with utilization justification, certificate-of-need evidence where required, and depreciation tied to service revenue.
Capital Planning questions
Section 1
How are fund restrictions enforced?
Expenditures validate against fund rules before commitment. Restricted funds refuse ineligible spend with the rule cited, rather than allowing it and flagging later.
Section 2
How do grants fit in?
Awards, drawdowns, expenditure tracking, and matching funds ride the same appropriation structure, with sponsor reports assembled from operational facts.
Section 3
Boards approve narratives, not data models. How do we present cases?
As stories with receipts: the need in plain language, the evidence behind it, the cost, and the outcome metric — each claim one click from its source events.
data View
section: faqs
content section
value: When an audit asks where the money went, the trail from appropriation to outcome is already assembled — fund, program, cost center, commitments, expenditures, and the operational evidence behind each one.
Section 6
Appropriation requests bound to asset and demand evidence
Section 7
Fund, program, and cost-center tracking
Section 8
Commitment versus expenditure visibility
Section 9
Grant and matching-fund linkage where applicable