Sub-module
Adaptive Battle-Damage and Effect Assessment
Compare desired effects with execution evidence, independent observations, uncertainty and residual capability.
How it works
Assessment keeps physical, functional, behavioral, system and campaign effects separate and records disagreement across sources.
Plan collection, assess correspondence and decide whether to close, continue observation, mitigate or propose follow-on action.
Commanders can adapt without treating a first report or model estimate as verified success.
Operational contract
The admitted inputs, produced evidence and boundary of this capability.
- InputsNeeds, alternatives and intended effects, Exact authority and owner contracts, Owner receipts and independent observations
- OutputsGoverned proposals and handoff receipts, Control and ambiguity records, Effect-assurance and mitigation evidence
- BoundaryAssessment never self-authorizes re-engagement or rewrites the original effect request.
Decision, degraded state and recovery
- Operational decisionDecide whether desired effects correspond to evidence and whether to close, observe, mitigate or propose follow-on action.
- Degraded or disputed stateDisputed observations and model disagreement keep effect dimensions open.
- Recovery and closureNew evidence recomputes correspondence while the original effect request and first assessment remain immutable.
- Authority boundaryAssessment never self-authorizes re-engagement or rewrites the original effect request.